Heart of Dixie · Appeal to Washington
The Stranger With the Tow Rope
Dunn v. Reeves (2021)
Charge: Capital murder - shooting of a good Samaritan during a robbery (ineffective-assistance habeas claim)Court: Supreme Court of the United States (on review of the Alabama state courts)Docket: Appeal to Washington
Should the federal appeals court have overturned the state court's ruling that his lawyers were not ineffective?
The facts
In November 1996 a young man and his friends set out looking for robberies. When their car broke down, a stranger named Willie Johnson stopped and towed it. The young man shot Johnson in the neck with a shotgun and directed others to take his money; he later bragged about the shooting and made up a dance mocking Johnson's death. Convicted and sentenced to death, he later argued his trial lawyers were ineffective for not hiring a neuropsychologist to develop evidence of intellectual disability. A federal appeals court agreed and granted relief.
You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.
Citation: Dunn v. Reeves, Dunn v. Reeves, 594 U.S. ___ (2021) (per curiam), No. 20-1084 (July 2, 2021)
Read more at supreme.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.