Sober As A Judge

Sober As A Judge / Case library / The Point Spread

Monday Night Court · The Point Spread

A Thousand Dollars for the Centre

Glickfield v. State (1953)

Charge: Attempted bribery of an athlete - a man offers a University of Maryland centre $1,000 to keep the Terrapins from covering the spread against LSUCourt: Court of Appeals of Maryland (on appeal from a bench trial prosecuted by the State's Attorney for Prince George's County; the opinion does not name the trial court)Docket: The Point Spread

Can a judge convict a man of bribery for offering a college centre cash to shave points, on the player's word alone and under a statute that never defines what the player must do?

The facts

College Park, Maryland, October 1952. Two days before Maryland's home game against Louisiana State on 25 October, a man named Glickfield offered Thomas E. Cosgrove, the Terrapins' offensive centre, $1,000. The deal, as the State put it, was for Cosgrove to 'control the score': Maryland could still win, but not by more than 20½ points, the line the gambling syndicates were betting. Cosgrove, who admitted he disliked Glickfield, reported the offer to his coach and others. On the coach's instructions he and a team-mate tried to set up a second meeting to trap the briber, but it never came off. Glickfield was indicted under a 1939 Maryland statute making it bribery to 'bribe or attempt to bribe any persons participating in or connected in any way' with an athletic contest. He chose trial by a judge sitting without a jury. His lawyers argued the statute was hopelessly vague, since a player, unlike a public official, owes no legal duty to anyone about how he plays; that one of his two lawyers had been wrongly shut out of the courtroom with the other witnesses; that the State's Attorney had improperly conferred with Cosgrove during a recess in cross-examination; and that Cosgrove was a biased, impeached witness (he admitted on cross-examination to having gone into a university building to look for examination papers) whose word should not carry a conviction.

You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.

Citation: Glickfield v. State, 203 Md. 400, 101 A.2d 229 (1953)

Read more at casemine.com. The source reveals the outcome.

← More from The Point Spread · All dockets