Case library · House Deck
Half Price Food Stamps
Liparota v. United States (1985)
Charge: Acquiring food stamps in a manner not authorised by lawCourt: U.S. Supreme CourtState: IllinoisDocket: House Deck
The facts
A man co-owned a sandwich shop. Three times he bought food stamps from a man who turned out to be an undercover government agent. He paid $150 for $195 worth, $350 for $500 worth, and $300 for $500 worth. His shop was not authorised to accept food stamps at all. The law makes it a crime to "knowingly" acquire food stamps in a way not authorised by the rules. At trial the judge told the jury the prosecution did not have to prove he knew the deals were unauthorised.
You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.
Citation: Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419 (1985)
Read more at supreme.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.