Case library · Banned
The Unsolicited Brochures
Miller v. California (1973)
Charge: Knowingly distributing obscene matterCourt: U.S. Supreme CourtState: CaliforniaDocket: Banned
The facts
A man ran a mass mailing campaign to sell adult books and films. He sent five unsolicited advertising brochures to a restaurant. The owner and his elderly mother opened the envelope. The brochures showed men and women in groups engaged in sex acts, with genitals prominently displayed. They complained to police. He was charged with knowingly distributing obscene matter and convicted by a jury. He argues the jury was wrongly told to judge the material by local community standards, and that only work utterly without redeeming social value can be obscene.
You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.
Citation: Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)
Read more at supreme.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.