Sober As A Judge

Sober As A Judge / Case library / Prohibition

Case library · Prohibition

Wiretaps and a Liquor Ring

Olmstead v. United States (1928)

Charge: Conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act by possessing, transporting and importing liquorCourt: U.S. Supreme Court (on certiorari from the Ninth Circuit; trial in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington)State: WashingtonDocket: Prohibition

The facts

A man ran a large business bringing in and selling liquor while the national ban was in force. Federal agents tapped eight telephone lines serving the business offices and the homes of the men involved. They listened for nearly five months and typed up around 775 pages of conversations. No agent ever entered a house or office to do it; the wires were tapped outside. He argued the secret listening was an unlawful search and that his own recorded words should not have been used against him.

You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.

Citation: Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928)

Read more at supreme.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.

← All cases