Case library · Trial by Fire
The Rental Building
Russell v. United States (1985)
Charge: Attempted arson of a building used in an activity affecting interstate commerceCourt: Supreme Court of the United StatesState: IllinoisDocket: Trial by Fire
The facts
A man owned a two-unit apartment building in a large city. He earned rental income from it and treated it as business property for tax purposes. He made an unsuccessful attempt to set fire to the building and was indicted under a federal law that punishes anyone who maliciously damages or destroys, or attempts to damage or destroy, by fire or an explosive any building used in interstate commerce or in any activity affecting interstate commerce. He argued that the federal law did not reach his building: it was not commercial or business property, and so could not be the subject of the federal arson offence.
You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.
Citation: Russell v. United States, 471 U.S. 858 (1985)
Read more at supreme.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.