Monday Night Court · The Point Spread
Red Box and the Baton Rouge Line
United States v. Box (1976)
Charge: Illegal gambling business - a Shreveport billiard-parlour owner is swept up in raids on the city's football bookmakers after 223 phone calls to a Baton Rouge bookieCourt: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (on appeal from a federal jury trial in Louisiana; the opinion does not name the district court)Docket: The Point Spread
Is a man who bets big, phones a bookie hundreds of times and occasionally takes a lay-off wager 'conducting' an illegal gambling business, or merely one of its customers?
The facts
Shreveport and Bossier City, Louisiana, autumn 1973. Federal agents spent the football season investigating several bookmaking operations and raided them all at once on the last day of the season. Bettors wagered on single games against the point spread, on slips like 'G.B. + 14 = 200', paying the bookie 10 per cent 'juice' on losses. A one-count indictment filed in April 1974 charged Henry Floyd 'Red' Box and ten other men with conducting an illegal gambling business under the federal statute that reaches operations of five or more people. One defendant was severed and six pleaded before trial; four went before a jury for five days with 21 witnesses, one of them pleading guilty mid-trial. The evidence against Box: he owned the Guys & Dolls Billiard Parlor; phone records showed 223 calls from the parlour and 20 from his home to Price, a Baton Rouge bookmaker; two immunised bookmakers, Cook and Stewart, described Box as a bettor and customer, and Cook said he had occasionally 'laid off' bets with Box, who was free to decline them, and Stewart had given Box favourable odds; and about $3,800 in slips bearing Box's name at 11-to-10 odds were seized from Stewart's operation. Box argued he was never a bookmaker at all: nobody showed he had customers, set a line or ran a book from the pool hall; he was simply a heavy bettor who sometimes got favourable odds.
You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.
Citation: United States v. Box, 530 F.2d 1258 (5th Cir. 1976)
Read more at openjurist.org. The source reveals the outcome.