Case library · The Poacher's Docket
Farther Out Than True
United States v. Carr (2013)
Charge: Lacey Act / closed-area fishingCourt: U.S. District Court, D. AlaskaState: AlaskaDocket: The Poacher's Docket
Did the owner fish grounds closed to him and then report the catch as taken from water he was allowed to work?
The facts
A vessel owner fished for rockfish on four trips in a single July. The grounds he worked, close inshore, were shut to him that season and he had no authorisation for them. On the paperwork he recorded the catch as taken from grounds much farther out. The four loads were worth about a hundred and forty-six thousand dollars. He had fished the same closed ground on three trips the summer before.
You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.
Citation: United States v. Carr (D. Alaska 2013)
Read more at justice.gov. The source reveals the outcome.