Case library · Lawyers in the Dock
The Shrinking Settlement
United States v. Cunningham (2012)
Charge: Conspiracy to commit wire fraudCourt: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth CircuitState: KentuckyDocket: Lawyers in the Dock
The facts
Two lawyers represented about 431 clients in a mass-injury suit over a diet drug and negotiated a single $200 million settlement for all of them. Prosecutors said the clients were never told the total or how it was divided; instead each was told the lawyers had negotiated a separate deal and was offered less than his calculated share, and clients who complained were later falsely told their claims had been renegotiated. Clients received about $73.5 million; the two lawyers took over $21 million and nearly $31 million, and $20 million went to a charity the clients were told would be very small. The defence said there was no intent to defraud: they had relied on another lawyer's advice and the approval of the judge overseeing the settlement.
You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.
Citation: United States v. Cunningham, 679 F.3d 355 (6th Cir. 2012)
Read more at govinfo.gov. The source reveals the outcome.