Sober As A Judge

Sober As A Judge / Case library / The Fix

Case library · The Fix

The Big Exacta

United States v. DiNapoli (1977)

Charge: Conspiracy to fix horse races by briberyCourt: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitState: New YorkDocket: The Fix

The facts

Over four days in October 1970, a group set out to rig the exacta bets at a Pennsylvania racetrack, where bettors must pick the first two finishers. Prosecutors said jockeys riding the favourites were paid $200 to $500 each to make sure their horses did not finish in the top two, while the group bought every exacta combination except those involving the bribed horses, collecting more than $90,000. One man was accused of advancing $5,000 to finance the venture, attending meetings at the track and helping negotiate the bribes. The main witness was a co-conspirator, and two jockeys said he was present when bribes were discussed. The defence argued the chief witness was biased and would frame others to stay out of jail.

You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.

Citation: United States v. DiNapoli, 557 F.2d 962 (2d Cir. 1977)

Read more at law.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.

← More from The Fix · All dockets