Case library · No Choice
Trespass To Stop The Bombs
United States v. Maxwell (2001)
Charge: Entering a closed military installation without permissionCourt: U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (on appeal from the District of Puerto Rico)State: Puerto RicoDocket: No Choice
The facts
A protester walked onto a closed naval base on an inhabited island used for live bombing practice. He went up to a security officer, said he was a protester, and asked for water. Entering the base without the commander's permission is a federal crime. He said the shelling was harming the people who lived there, so his trespass was necessary. That defence required him to show the harm was immediate, that his act would help stop it, and that lawful options had run out.
You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.
Citation: United States v. Maxwell, 254 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2001)
Read more at caselaw.findlaw.com. The source reveals the outcome.