Case library · Prohibition
Two Sentences, One Term?
United States v. Remus (1926)
Charge: Conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act, and a separate misdemeanour violation of the same ActCourt: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth CircuitState: OhioDocket: Prohibition
The facts
A man was convicted twice, eight days apart, of breaking the national liquor ban. One conviction was for conspiracy and carried two years in a federal penitentiary. The other was a lesser offence and carried one year in a county jail. Neither written judgment said the jail term should wait until the penitentiary term was finished. He served the longer term and was released. Three years later officers came to take him in for the jail term. He said he had already served both at the same time.
You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.
Citation: United States v. Remus, 12 F.2d 239 (6th Cir. 1926)
Read more at law.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.