Case library · Court-Martial
The Blue Beret
United States v. Specialist Michael G. New (2001)
Charge: Failure to obey a lawful orderCourt: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed ForcesState: Overseas (military)Docket: Court-Martial
The facts
A U.S. Army specialist's battalion was assigned to a United Nations preventive deployment force in the Balkans. His commanders ordered the soldiers to wear United Nations items with their uniforms: a blue UN beret and field cap, a UN shoulder patch, a blue scarf, and a UN badge and identification card. At a company formation, the specialist appeared without the UN items, even though he had been given two opportunities to comply. He was charged with failing to obey a lawful order. The defence argued that the order was unlawful because it conflicted with the Army's uniform regulation and because the deployment itself lacked a proper constitutional basis, and that the members of the court-martial, not the judge, should have decided whether the order was lawful.
You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.
Citation: United States v. New, 55 M.J. 95 (C.A.A.F. 2001)
Read more at armfor.uscourts.gov. The source reveals the outcome.