Case library · The Con
Crude That Wasn't
United States v. Young (1985)
Charge: Mail fraud and false statementsCourt: U.S. Supreme CourtState: OklahomaDocket: The Con
The facts
A vice-president of a Texas petroleum company contracted to deliver crude oil to an Oklahoma refinery in 1976 and 1977. Prosecutors said that of about 205,000 barrels delivered, roughly 117,250 were actually fuel oil — a cheaper, already refined product — bought through a broker, blended with condensate from natural-gas wells to disguise it, and falsely certified as crude on the invoices. He was charged with mail fraud, false statements to a government agency and interstate transportation of stolen property. In closing, his lawyer told the jury that prosecutors themselves did not believe he meant to defraud anyone; the prosecutor answered that he personally believed the man was guilty. There was no objection. The defence argued on appeal that the prosecutor's remarks required a new trial.
You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.
Citation: United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1 (1985)
Read more at supreme.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.