Sober As A Judge

Sober As A Judge / Case library / The Red Scare

Case library · The Red Scare

He Would Not Name Others

Watkins v. United States (1957)

Charge: Contempt of Congress — refusing to answer questions pertinent to the inquiryCourt: U.S. Supreme CourtState: District of ColumbiaDocket: The Red Scare

The facts

A labour organiser was summoned before a congressional subcommittee investigating communism. He answered fully about himself and his own dealings with the party, but refused to say whether other named people had been members, arguing those questions were outside what the committee had been set up to examine. He was prosecuted for refusing to answer questions 'pertinent to the question under inquiry', tried by a judge without a jury, and convicted. The dispute is whether he could tell what the inquiry's subject actually was.

You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.

Citation: Watkins v. United States, 354 U.S. 178 (1957)

Read more at supreme.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.

← All cases