Case library · The Con
The Float Between Banks
Williams v. United States (1982)
Charge: Making false statements to a federally insured bankCourt: U.S. Supreme CourtState: LouisianaDocket: The Con
The facts
The president of a small Louisiana bank opened an account at another bank with about $4,650. The next day he wrote a $58,500 cheque on that account and deposited it at his own bank, then wrote a $60,000 cheque on that account and deposited it back at the second bank, using the days it took cheques to clear to create funds that did not exist. A later $65,000 cheque on a third bank, where he had about $1,200, was refused, and he settled up with a money order from mortgage proceeds. He was charged under a federal law punishing anyone who makes a false statement to influence a federally insured bank. The defence argued that a cheque, even a bad one, is not a statement at all.
You have the facts the court had. Guilty or not guilty? Call it in the game with your friends, then see what the court actually decided. Wrong call, you drink.
Citation: Williams v. United States, 458 U.S. 279 (1982)
Read more at supreme.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.